Sony Xperia go vs Cubot X18 Plus
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia go vs Cubot X18 Plus
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (52.14 USD vs 90.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (10 points vs 480 points)
Worse battery (3 points vs 305 points)
Worse performance (3 points vs 331 points)
Worse connectivity (6 points vs 67 points)
Worse display (1 points vs 397 points)
Worse design (49 points vs 478 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (1305mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (2 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less gpu cores (1 cores vs 2 cores)
Less ram (512 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (3.5 inch vs 5.99 inch)
Lower pixel density (165 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (54.67 percents vs 79.63 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (480 points vs 10 points)
Better battery (305 points vs 3 points)
Better performance (331 points vs 3 points)
Better connectivity (67 points vs 6 points)
Better display (397 points vs 1 points)
Better design (478 points vs 49 points)
Against:
Higher price (90.99 USD vs 52.14 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 1305mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More gpu cores (2 cores vs 1 cores)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 512 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.99 inch vs 3.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 165 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (79.63 percents vs 54.67 percents)