HTC 10 vs UMiDIGI F1

For:

      Lower price (107.64 USD vs 191 USD)

Against:

      Worse camera (369 points vs 572 points)

      Worse battery (133 points vs 869 points)

      Worse performance (405 points vs 505 points)

      Worse connectivity (755 points vs 884 points)

      Worse display (604 points vs 630 points)

      Worse design (234 points vs 496 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 5150mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2150 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Lower gpu frequency (624 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (565 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.3 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (71.29 percents vs 83.85 percents)

For:

      Better camera (572 points vs 369 points)

      Better battery (869 points vs 133 points)

      Better performance (505 points vs 405 points)

      Better connectivity (884 points vs 755 points)

      Better display (630 points vs 604 points)

      Better design (496 points vs 234 points)

Against:

      Higher price (191 USD vs 107.64 USD)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3000mAh)

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 624 megahertz)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2150 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.2 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 565 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.85 percents vs 71.29 percents)