HTC 10 vs UMiDIGI A7 Pro
Compare Phones: HTC 10 vs UMiDIGI A7 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (107.64 USD vs 169.21 USD)
Better performance (402 points vs 386 points)
Better display (602 points vs 482 points)
Against:
Worse camera (366 points vs 589 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 531 points)
Worse connectivity (753 points vs 848 points)
Worse design (233 points vs 527 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2150 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (624 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (565 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.29 percents vs 82.23 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (589 points vs 366 points)
Better battery (531 points vs 133 points)
Better connectivity (848 points vs 753 points)
Better design (527 points vs 233 points)
Against:
Higher price (169.21 USD vs 107.64 USD)
Worse performance (386 points vs 402 points)
Worse display (482 points vs 602 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 624 megahertz)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2150 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 565 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.23 percents vs 71.29 percents)