HTC 10 vs UMiDIGI A7 Pro

For:

      Lower price (107.64 USD vs 169.21 USD)

      Better performance (402 points vs 386 points)

      Better display (602 points vs 482 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (366 points vs 589 points)

      Worse battery (133 points vs 531 points)

      Worse connectivity (753 points vs 848 points)

      Worse design (233 points vs 527 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4150mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2150 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Lower gpu frequency (624 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (565 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.3 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (71.29 percents vs 82.23 percents)

For:

      Better camera (589 points vs 366 points)

      Better battery (531 points vs 133 points)

      Better connectivity (848 points vs 753 points)

      Better design (527 points vs 233 points)

Against:

      Higher price (169.21 USD vs 107.64 USD)

      Worse performance (386 points vs 402 points)

      Worse display (482 points vs 602 points)

For:

      Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 3000mAh)

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      Higher gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 624 megahertz)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2150 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.2 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 565 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (82.23 percents vs 71.29 percents)