LeEco Le 2 vs LG Velvet
Compare Phones: LeEco Le 2 vs LG Velvet
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (197.3 USD vs 758.43 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (459 points vs 813 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 585 points)
Worse performance (413 points vs 895 points)
Worse connectivity (263 points vs 702 points)
Worse display (311 points vs 746 points)
Worse design (402 points vs 990 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (10 cores vs 8 cores)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.8 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (74.62 percents vs 88.97 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (813 points vs 459 points)
Better battery (585 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (895 points vs 413 points)
Better connectivity (702 points vs 263 points)
Better display (746 points vs 311 points)
Better design (990 points vs 402 points)
Against:
Higher price (758.43 USD vs 197.3 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4300mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Less cpu cores (8 cores vs 10 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.8 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.97 percents vs 74.62 percents)