Sony Xperia XZ vs Oukitel C17 Pro
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XZ vs Oukitel C17 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (610 points vs 168 points)
Better connectivity (842 points vs 679 points)
Better display (333 points vs 220 points)
Against:
Higher price (154.99 USD vs 127.99 USD)
Worse battery (121 points vs 373 points)
Worse performance (291 points vs 389 points)
Worse design (286 points vs 604 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (22.85 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2900mAh vs 3900mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2150 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (624 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 271 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.35 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.14 percents vs 83.47 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (127.99 USD vs 154.99 USD)
Better battery (373 points vs 121 points)
Better performance (389 points vs 291 points)
Better design (604 points vs 286 points)
Against:
Worse camera (168 points vs 610 points)
Worse connectivity (679 points vs 842 points)
Worse display (220 points vs 333 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 22.85 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (3900mAh vs 2900mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 624 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2150 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.35 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (271 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.47 percents vs 71.14 percents)