Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs Lenovo Z5
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs Lenovo Z5
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (113.68 USD vs 193.62 USD)
Better battery (508 points vs 222 points)
Against:
Worse camera (349 points vs 514 points)
Worse performance (316 points vs 631 points)
Worse connectivity (290 points vs 395 points)
Worse display (311 points vs 541 points)
Worse design (310 points vs 809 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4100mAh vs 3300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.2 inch)
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (72.9 percents vs 83.95 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (514 points vs 349 points)
Better performance (631 points vs 316 points)
Better connectivity (395 points vs 290 points)
Better display (541 points vs 311 points)
Better design (809 points vs 310 points)
Against:
Higher price (193.62 USD vs 113.68 USD)
Worse battery (222 points vs 508 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3300mAh vs 4100mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.2 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.95 percents vs 72.9 percents)