LG G6 vs Cubot X19
Compare Phones: LG G6 vs Cubot X19
Summary |
|
For:
Better connectivity (204 points vs 67 points)
Better display (848 points vs 395 points)
Better design (479 points vs 314 points)
Against:
Higher price (180 USD vs 94.99 USD)
Worse camera (461 points vs 478 points)
Worse battery (222 points vs 377 points)
Worse performance (409 points vs 422 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3300mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2350 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (653 megahertz vs 770 megahertz)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (565 pixels per inch vs 407 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.7 inch vs 5.93 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (78.56 percents vs 78.63 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (94.99 USD vs 180 USD)
Better camera (478 points vs 461 points)
Better battery (377 points vs 222 points)
Better performance (422 points vs 409 points)
Against:
Worse connectivity (67 points vs 204 points)
Worse display (395 points vs 848 points)
Worse design (314 points vs 479 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 3300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (770 megahertz vs 653 megahertz)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2350 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.93 inch vs 5.7 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (407 pixels per inch vs 565 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (78.63 percents vs 78.56 percents)