Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra vs UMiDIGI F1
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra vs UMiDIGI F1
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (144.99 USD vs 191 USD)
Better camera (628 points vs 569 points)
Against:
Worse battery (68 points vs 870 points)
Worse performance (425 points vs 501 points)
Worse connectivity (699 points vs 883 points)
Worse display (410 points vs 628 points)
Worse design (408 points vs 492 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (22 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse front camera resolution (15.87 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2700mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Against:
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (367 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (76.38 percents vs 83.85 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (870 points vs 68 points)
Better performance (501 points vs 425 points)
Better connectivity (883 points vs 699 points)
Better display (628 points vs 410 points)
Better design (492 points vs 408 points)
Against:
Higher price (191 USD vs 144.99 USD)
Worse camera (569 points vs 628 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 15.87 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 2700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 367 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.85 percents vs 76.38 percents)