Sony Xperia XZ Premium vs Huawei P40 Pro+
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XZ Premium vs Huawei P40 Pro+
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (196.99 USD vs 1274.57 USD)
Better connectivity (842 points vs 805 points)
Better display (978 points vs 842 points)
Against:
Worse camera (565 points vs 595 points)
Worse battery (215 points vs 545 points)
Worse performance (597 points vs 961 points)
Worse design (320 points vs 815 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.9)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3230mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2450 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (801 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.58 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.65 percents vs 91.92 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (595 points vs 565 points)
Better battery (545 points vs 215 points)
Better performance (961 points vs 597 points)
Better design (815 points vs 320 points)
Against:
Higher price (1274.57 USD vs 196.99 USD)
Worse connectivity (805 points vs 842 points)
Worse display (842 points vs 978 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.9 vs f/2)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4200mAh vs 3230mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 2450 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.58 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 801 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.92 percents vs 69.65 percents)