Sony Xperia XZ Premium Dual vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G

For:

      Lower price (255.99 USD vs 369.19 USD)

      Better connectivity (882 points vs 638 points)

      Better display (978 points vs 897 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (565 points vs 670 points)

      Worse battery (215 points vs 541 points)

      Worse performance (597 points vs 745 points)

      Worse design (320 points vs 884 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)

      Worse main camera resolution (19.2 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 14.48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3230mAh vs 4160mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2450 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)

Against:

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (801 pixels per inch vs 392 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.57 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (69.65 percents vs 87.25 percents)

For:

      Better camera (670 points vs 565 points)

      Better battery (541 points vs 215 points)

      Better performance (745 points vs 597 points)

      Better design (884 points vs 320 points)

Against:

      Higher price (369.19 USD vs 255.99 USD)

      Worse connectivity (638 points vs 882 points)

      Worse display (897 points vs 978 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 19.2 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (14.48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4160mAh vs 3230mAh)

For:

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2450 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 5.5 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (392 pixels per inch vs 801 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (87.25 percents vs 69.65 percents)