Xiaomi Redmi Note vs Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note vs Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (207 points vs 42 points)
Better display (122 points vs 30 points)
Better design (211 points vs 197 points)
Against:
Higher price (72.49 USD vs 70.08 USD)
Worse camera (352 points vs 492 points)
Worse performance (146 points vs 171 points)
Worse connectivity (1 points vs 515 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (5.01 Megapixels vs 2.06 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (13.13 Megapixels vs 20.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (3200mAh vs 2600mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 578 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1700 megahertz vs 2500 megahertz)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.5 inch vs 4.59 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 319 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.03 percents vs 71 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (70.08 USD vs 72.49 USD)
Better camera (492 points vs 352 points)
Better performance (171 points vs 146 points)
Better connectivity (515 points vs 1 points)
Against:
Worse battery (42 points vs 207 points)
Worse display (30 points vs 122 points)
Worse design (197 points vs 211 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/2 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (20.66 Megapixels vs 13.13 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (2.06 Megapixels vs 5.01 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2600mAh vs 3200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2500 megahertz vs 1700 megahertz)
More rom (16384 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (578 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (319 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (4.59 inch vs 5.5 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (71 percents vs 69.03 percents)