Xiaomi Redmi Note vs Sony Xperia Z
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note vs Sony Xperia Z
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (352 points vs 192 points)
Better battery (207 points vs 30 points)
Better performance (146 points vs 122 points)
Against:
Higher price (72.49 USD vs 66 USD)
Worse connectivity (1 points vs 250 points)
Worse display (122 points vs 199 points)
Worse design (211 points vs 263 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2.4)
Better main camera resolution (13.13 Megapixels vs 12.78 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (5.01 Megapixels vs 2.06 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (3200mAh vs 2330mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (1700 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 400 megahertz)
Against:
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.5 inch vs 5 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.03 percents vs 70.06 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (66 USD vs 72.49 USD)
Better connectivity (250 points vs 1 points)
Better display (199 points vs 122 points)
Better design (263 points vs 211 points)
Against:
Worse camera (192 points vs 352 points)
Worse battery (30 points vs 207 points)
Worse performance (122 points vs 146 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.4 vs f/2.2)
Worse main camera resolution (12.78 Megapixels vs 13.13 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (2.06 Megapixels vs 5.01 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2330mAh vs 3200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More rom (16384 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 1700 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (400 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 5.5 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (70.06 percents vs 69.03 percents)