Oukitel K6000 Plus vs Oukitel C16 Pro
Compare Phones: Oukitel K6000 Plus vs Oukitel C16 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (412 points vs 53 points)
Better battery (944 points vs 42 points)
Better performance (333 points vs 230 points)
Better display (356 points vs 145 points)
Against:
Higher price (190.99 USD vs 80.99 USD)
Worse design (245 points vs 290 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6080mAh vs 2600mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 660 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 295 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 5.71 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (70.45 percents vs 79.33 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (80.99 USD vs 190.99 USD)
Better design (290 points vs 245 points)
Against:
Worse camera (53 points vs 412 points)
Worse battery (42 points vs 944 points)
Worse performance (230 points vs 333 points)
Worse display (145 points vs 356 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2600mAh vs 6080mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (660 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.71 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (295 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (79.33 percents vs 70.45 percents)