Sony Xperia L1 Dual vs Google Pixel 3a
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia L1 Dual vs Google Pixel 3a
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (147.99 USD vs 172.99 USD)
Better performance (132 points vs 94 points)
Against:
Worse camera (90 points vs 279 points)
Worse battery (59 points vs 81 points)
Worse connectivity (259 points vs 742 points)
Worse display (82 points vs 349 points)
Worse design (282 points vs 394 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2620mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1450 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 5.6 inch)
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (74.87 percents vs 73.69 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (279 points vs 90 points)
Better battery (81 points vs 59 points)
Better connectivity (742 points vs 259 points)
Better display (349 points vs 82 points)
Better design (394 points vs 282 points)
Against:
Higher price (172.99 USD vs 147.99 USD)
Worse performance (94 points vs 132 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (3000mAh vs 2620mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1450 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.6 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (73.69 percents vs 74.87 percents)