AllCall Rio vs Doogee BL5500 Lite
Compare Phones: AllCall Rio vs Doogee BL5500 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (67.69 USD vs 96.69 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (60 points vs 397 points)
Worse battery (69 points vs 907 points)
Worse performance (23 points vs 112 points)
Worse connectivity (6 points vs 287 points)
Worse display (86 points vs 244 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2)
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2700mAh vs 5500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (294 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.19 inch)
Design |
|
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (397 points vs 60 points)
Better battery (907 points vs 69 points)
Better performance (112 points vs 23 points)
Better connectivity (287 points vs 6 points)
Better display (244 points vs 86 points)
Against:
Higher price (96.69 USD vs 67.69 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/2 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 1.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5500mAh vs 2700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (2048 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.19 inch vs 5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 294 pixels per inch)
Design |
|