OnePlus 5 vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: OnePlus 5 vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (806 points vs 710 points)
Against:
Higher price (349.49 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Worse camera (648 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (222 points vs 869 points)
Worse connectivity (897 points vs 956 points)
Worse display (432 points vs 521 points)
Worse design (440 points vs 598 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3300mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2450 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (73.34 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254.99 USD vs 349.49 USD)
Better camera (914 points vs 648 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 222 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 897 points)
Better display (521 points vs 432 points)
Better design (598 points vs 440 points)
Against:
Worse performance (710 points vs 806 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2450 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 73.34 percents)