Jesy J9 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Compare Phones: Jesy J9 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (948 points vs 517 points)
Against:
Higher price (299.99 USD vs 212.82 USD)
Worse camera (447 points vs 962 points)
Worse performance (372 points vs 476 points)
Worse connectivity (285 points vs 369 points)
Worse display (353 points vs 685 points)
Worse design (48 points vs 631 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 64.14 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6150mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 4 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (58.94 percents vs 85.19 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (212.82 USD vs 299.99 USD)
Better camera (962 points vs 447 points)
Better performance (476 points vs 372 points)
Better connectivity (369 points vs 285 points)
Better display (685 points vs 353 points)
Better design (631 points vs 48 points)
Against:
Worse battery (517 points vs 948 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.14 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 6150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.19 percents vs 58.94 percents)