Cubot Note Plus vs Oukitel C8
Compare Phones: Cubot Note Plus vs Oukitel C8
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (463 points vs 61 points)
Better performance (194 points vs 52 points)
Better connectivity (54 points vs 30 points)
Better display (275 points vs 103 points)
Better design (263 points vs 217 points)
Against:
Higher price (115.99 USD vs 65 USD)
Worse battery (55 points vs 81 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2.4)
Better main camera resolution (13.13 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.38 Megapixels vs 1.92 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2800mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (3072 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (32768 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 260 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 5.5 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.41 percents vs 75.56 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (65 USD vs 115.99 USD)
Better battery (81 points vs 55 points)
Against:
Worse camera (61 points vs 463 points)
Worse performance (52 points vs 194 points)
Worse connectivity (30 points vs 54 points)
Worse display (103 points vs 275 points)
Worse design (217 points vs 263 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.4 vs f/2.2)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 13.13 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 13.38 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (3000mAh vs 2800mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.5 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (260 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (75.56 percents vs 69.41 percents)