Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (271.99 USD vs 408.99 USD)
Better performance (597 points vs 534 points)
Against:
Worse camera (475 points vs 832 points)
Worse battery (69 points vs 580 points)
Worse connectivity (702 points vs 832 points)
Worse display (70 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (184 points vs 994 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (19.2 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2700mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 490 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2450 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.59 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Lower pixel density (319 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.79 percents vs 85.49 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (832 points vs 475 points)
Better battery (580 points vs 69 points)
Better connectivity (832 points vs 702 points)
Better display (910 points vs 70 points)
Better design (994 points vs 184 points)
Against:
Higher price (408.99 USD vs 271.99 USD)
Worse performance (534 points vs 597 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 19.2 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4250mAh vs 2700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2450 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (490 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 4.59 inches)
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 319 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.49 percents vs 69.79 percents)