Sony Xperia XZ1 vs UMiDIGI X
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XZ1 vs UMiDIGI X
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (142.48 USD vs 182 USD)
Better performance (597 points vs 505 points)
Better display (333 points vs 326 points)
Against:
Worse camera (327 points vs 891 points)
Worse battery (69 points vs 534 points)
Worse connectivity (702 points vs 788 points)
Worse design (334 points vs 692 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (19.2 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2700mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2450 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.35 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.22 percents vs 83.23 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (891 points vs 327 points)
Better battery (534 points vs 69 points)
Better connectivity (788 points vs 702 points)
Better design (692 points vs 334 points)
Against:
Higher price (182 USD vs 142.48 USD)
Worse performance (505 points vs 597 points)
Worse display (326 points vs 333 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 19.2 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 2700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2450 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.35 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.23 percents vs 69.22 percents)