Sony Xperia XZ1 vs UMiDIGI A9 Pro
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XZ1 vs UMiDIGI A9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (142.48 USD vs 148.19 USD)
Better performance (593 points vs 501 points)
Against:
Worse camera (324 points vs 813 points)
Worse battery (68 points vs 531 points)
Worse connectivity (699 points vs 848 points)
Worse display (331 points vs 628 points)
Worse design (331 points vs 569 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (19.2 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2700mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2450 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.22 percents vs 82.23 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (813 points vs 324 points)
Better battery (531 points vs 68 points)
Better connectivity (848 points vs 699 points)
Better display (628 points vs 331 points)
Better design (569 points vs 331 points)
Against:
Higher price (148.19 USD vs 142.48 USD)
Worse performance (501 points vs 593 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 19.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 2700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2450 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.23 percents vs 69.22 percents)