Xiaomi Mi A1 vs Oukitel K9
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi A1 vs Oukitel K9
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (117.6 USD vs 278.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (438 points vs 512 points)
Worse battery (184 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (436 points vs 443 points)
Worse connectivity (395 points vs 515 points)
Worse display (413 points vs 819 points)
Worse design (379 points vs 745 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse main camera resolution (12 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3080mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 350 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 7.12 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.02 percents vs 83.66 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (512 points vs 438 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 184 points)
Better performance (443 points vs 436 points)
Better connectivity (515 points vs 395 points)
Better display (819 points vs 413 points)
Better design (745 points vs 379 points)
Against:
Higher price (278.99 USD vs 117.6 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3080mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (7.12 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (350 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.66 percents vs 71.02 percents)