Meitu T8s vs Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Compare Phones: Meitu T8s vs Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (264.55 USD vs 1100.27 USD)
Better performance (572 points vs 547 points)
Against:
Worse camera (605 points vs 747 points)
Worse battery (301 points vs 624 points)
Worse connectivity (118 points vs 897 points)
Worse display (349 points vs 933 points)
Worse design (189 points vs 904 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.9)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (21.46 Megapixels vs 50.33 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3580mAh vs 4400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (10 cores vs 8 cores)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2500 megahertz vs 3130 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (4 cores vs 24 cores)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.76 inch)
Lower pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 456 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (66.03 percents vs 94.41 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (747 points vs 605 points)
Better battery (624 points vs 301 points)
Better connectivity (897 points vs 118 points)
Better display (933 points vs 349 points)
Better design (904 points vs 189 points)
Against:
Higher price (1100.27 USD vs 264.55 USD)
Worse performance (547 points vs 572 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (50.33 Megapixels vs 21.46 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.8)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4400mAh vs 3580mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3130 megahertz vs 2500 megahertz)
More gpu cores (24 cores vs 4 cores)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Against:
Less cpu cores (8 cores vs 10 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.76 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Higher pixel density (456 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (94.41 percents vs 66.03 percents)