Enter product name

Compare phones and smartphones: Vivo X3V vs Sugar C11s vs Samsung Galaxy S9 Exynos vs nubia Z18 vs


0.3
Vivo X3V
0.35
0.3
0.71
0.46
0.46
3.08
1.17
5.04
no shops
N/A
Display Size5 Inch
Display TypeIPS
Display Area67.93%
Display Density294 PPI
Thickness6.75 mm
Weight166 gram
OsFuntouch OS (Android 4.4 KitKat)
SocQualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926
Cpu Cores4 Cores
Cpu Frequency1200 MHz
Ram2 gigabyte
Rom16 gigabyte
Sensor Type
Image Resolution7.99 Megapixels
Image Resolution5.04 Megapixels
Capacity2360 mAh
1.1
Sugar C11s
2.45
1.33
2.69
3.31
1.26
3.44
2.47
0.26
no shops
N/A
Display Size5.7 Inch
Display TypeIPS
Display Area75.76%
Display Density282 PPI
Thickness8.34 mm
Weight0 gram
OsSugar OS 3.3 (Android 7.1 Nougat)
SocQualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
Cpu Cores8 Cores
Cpu Frequency1400 MHz
Ram3 gigabyte
Rom32 gigabyte
Sensor TypeCMOS (complementary metal-oxide semiconductor)
Image Resolution12.98 Megapixels
Image Resolution15.93 Megapixels
Capacity3000 mAh
5.98
Samsung Galaxy S9 Exynos
3.1
1.33
6.06
6.76
9.68
6.03
3.79
9.9
no shops
291$
Display Size5.8 Inch
Display TypeSuper AMOLED
Display Area84.41%
Display Density568 PPI
Thickness8.5 mm
Weight163 gram
OsAndroid 8.0 Oreo
Android 9.0 Pie
SocSamsung Exynos 9 9810
Cpu Cores8 Cores
Cpu Frequency2700 MHz
Ram4 gigabyte
Rom64 gigabyte
Sensor TypeISOCELL
Image Resolution12.19 Megapixels
Image Resolution7.99 Megapixels
Capacity3000 mAh
5.47
nubia Z18
4.82
2.72
8.47
5.4
7.31
6.09
3.04
3.76
no shops
393$
Display Size5.99 Inch
Display TypeJDI IPS
Display Area86.19%
Display Density403 PPI
Thickness8.55 mm
Weight172 gram
OsAndroid 8.1 Oreo
SocQualcomm Snapdragon 845
Cpu Cores8 Cores
Cpu Frequency2800 MHz
Ram6 gigabyte
Rom64 gigabyte
Sensor TypeCMOS (complementary metal-oxide semiconductor)
Image Resolution15.93 Megapixels
Image Resolution7.99 Megapixels
Capacity3450 mAh

Subscribe to our news

To subscribe to our email news, simply send us your email address using the form below. You will receive emails from the Device Ranks alerting you to latest gadget releases.