Alldocube X Neo vs Alldocube M5X Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (901 points vs 747 points)
Better battery (887 points vs 781 points)
Better connectivity (924 points vs 865 points)
Better design (902 points vs 829 points)
Against:
Higher price (282.3 USD vs 212.73 USD)
Worse performance (961 points vs 997 points)
Worse display (875 points vs 906 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 1.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (7700mAh vs 6600mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (8 cores vs 10 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (10.5 inch vs 10.1 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (288 pixels per inch vs 299 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (77.41 percents vs 71.62 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (212.73 USD vs 282.3 USD)
Better performance (997 points vs 961 points)
Better display (906 points vs 875 points)
Against:
Worse camera (747 points vs 901 points)
Worse battery (781 points vs 887 points)
Worse connectivity (865 points vs 924 points)
Worse design (829 points vs 902 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 0.49 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (6600mAh vs 7700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (10 cores vs 8 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (299 pixels per inch vs 288 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (10.1 inch vs 10.5 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.62 percents vs 77.41 percents)