Onda V975m vs Alldocube X Neo
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (235.09 USD vs 282.3 USD)
Better battery (931 points vs 887 points)
Against:
Worse camera (614 points vs 901 points)
Worse performance (827 points vs 961 points)
Worse connectivity (120 points vs 924 points)
Worse display (614 points vs 875 points)
Worse design (756 points vs 902 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (8200mAh vs 7700mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (9.69 inch vs 10.5 inch)
Lower pixel density (264 pixels per inch vs 288 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (64.98 percents vs 77.41 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (901 points vs 614 points)
Better performance (961 points vs 827 points)
Better connectivity (924 points vs 120 points)
Better display (875 points vs 614 points)
Better design (902 points vs 756 points)
Against:
Higher price (282.3 USD vs 235.09 USD)
Worse battery (887 points vs 931 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (7700mAh vs 8200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (10.5 inch vs 9.69 inches)
Higher pixel density (288 pixels per inch vs 264 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (77.41 percents vs 64.98 percents)