Huawei nova 3 vs Realme Narzo 30A

For:

      Better camera (598 points vs 159 points)

      Better performance (578 points vs 168 points)

      Better connectivity (638 points vs 222 points)

      Better display (630 points vs 247 points)

Against:

      Higher price (139.8 USD vs 130.49 USD)

      Worse battery (346 points vs 927 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3750mAh vs 6000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2360 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      More gpu cores (12 cores vs 2 cores)

      More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (767 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 270 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.5 inch)

For:

      Lower price (130.49 USD vs 139.8 USD)

      Better battery (927 points vs 346 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (159 points vs 598 points)

      Worse performance (168 points vs 578 points)

      Worse connectivity (222 points vs 638 points)

      Worse display (247 points vs 630 points)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3750mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 767 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2360 megahertz)

      Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 12 cores)

      Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.5 inch vs 6.3 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (270 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)