Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs Doogee X95 Pro

For:

      Lower price (58.82 USD vs 123.29 USD)

      Better camera (808 points vs 245 points)

      Better performance (459 points vs 281 points)

      Better connectivity (369 points vs 148 points)

      Better display (628 points vs 375 points)

      Better design (667 points vs 647 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (305 points vs 611 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4350mAh)

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 264 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.52 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (82 percents vs 82.85 percents)

For:

      Better battery (611 points vs 305 points)

Against:

      Higher price (123.29 USD vs 58.82 USD)

      Worse camera (245 points vs 808 points)

      Worse performance (281 points vs 459 points)

      Worse connectivity (148 points vs 369 points)

      Worse display (375 points vs 628 points)

      Worse design (647 points vs 667 points)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4350mAh vs 4000mAh)

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.52 inch vs 6.3 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (264 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (82.85 percents vs 82 percents)