Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs UMiDIGI A3S
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs UMiDIGI A3S
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 81.99 USD)
Better camera (808 points vs 512 points)
Better performance (459 points vs 158 points)
Better display (628 points vs 126 points)
Better design (667 points vs 337 points)
Against:
Worse battery (305 points vs 373 points)
Worse connectivity (369 points vs 753 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 3950mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.7 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 282 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 75.06 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (373 points vs 305 points)
Better connectivity (753 points vs 369 points)
Against:
Higher price (81.99 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (512 points vs 808 points)
Worse performance (158 points vs 459 points)
Worse display (126 points vs 628 points)
Worse design (337 points vs 667 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3950mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.7 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (282 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.06 percents vs 82 percents)