Nokia Lumia 630 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5G
Compare Phones: Nokia Lumia 630 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (55 USD vs 215.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (12 points vs 771 points)
Worse battery (13 points vs 712 points)
Worse performance (29 points vs 245 points)
Worse connectivity (6 points vs 449 points)
Worse display (10 points vs 726 points)
Worse design (137 points vs 467 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.4 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (1830mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1200 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less gpu cores (1 cores vs 3 cores)
Less ram (512 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (218 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (64.81 percents vs 82.55 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (771 points vs 12 points)
Better battery (712 points vs 13 points)
Better performance (245 points vs 29 points)
Better connectivity (449 points vs 6 points)
Better display (726 points vs 10 points)
Better design (467 points vs 137 points)
Against:
Higher price (215.99 USD vs 55 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.4)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 1830mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 1200 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 1 cores)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 512 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 4.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 218 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.55 percents vs 64.81 percents)