Xiaomi Mi 6X vs Cubot X50

For:

      Lower price (168.56 USD vs 281.19 USD)

      Better design (725 points vs 595 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (634 points vs 966 points)

      Worse battery (178 points vs 519 points)

      Worse performance (564 points vs 871 points)

      Worse connectivity (336 points vs 745 points)

      Worse display (577 points vs 605 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse main camera resolution (12 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (20.2 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3030mAh vs 4500mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (5.99 inch vs 6.67 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (77.63 percents vs 84.02 percents)

For:

      Better camera (966 points vs 634 points)

      Better battery (519 points vs 178 points)

      Better performance (871 points vs 564 points)

      Better connectivity (745 points vs 336 points)

      Better display (605 points vs 577 points)

Against:

      Higher price (281.19 USD vs 168.56 USD)

      Worse design (595 points vs 725 points)

For:

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 20.2 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3030mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 5.99 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 77.63 percents)