Meizu 16 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

For:

      Lower price (335.85 USD vs 408.99 USD)

      Better performance (847 points vs 530 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (601 points vs 831 points)

      Worse battery (100 points vs 577 points)

      Worse connectivity (391 points vs 831 points)

      Worse display (504 points vs 909 points)

      Worse design (865 points vs 994 points)

For:

      Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3010mAh vs 4250mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 490 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.55 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (84.6 percents vs 85.49 percents)

For:

      Better camera (831 points vs 601 points)

      Better battery (577 points vs 100 points)

      Better connectivity (831 points vs 391 points)

      Better display (909 points vs 504 points)

      Better design (994 points vs 865 points)

Against:

      Higher price (408.99 USD vs 335.85 USD)

      Worse performance (530 points vs 847 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4250mAh vs 3010mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (490 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 6 inches)

For:

      Bigger display area (85.49 percents vs 84.6 percents)