Meizu 16 vs Realme GT Neo Flash
Compare Phones: Meizu 16 vs Realme GT Neo Flash
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (335.85 USD vs 448 USD)
Better performance (848 points vs 803 points)
Better design (867 points vs 793 points)
Against:
Worse camera (604 points vs 937 points)
Worse battery (100 points vs 644 points)
Worse connectivity (395 points vs 737 points)
Worse display (506 points vs 749 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3010mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2800 megahertz vs 3000 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.43 inch)
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.6 percents vs 86.2 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (937 points vs 604 points)
Better battery (644 points vs 100 points)
Better connectivity (737 points vs 395 points)
Better display (749 points vs 506 points)
Against:
Higher price (448 USD vs 335.85 USD)
Worse performance (803 points vs 848 points)
Worse design (793 points vs 867 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3010mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3000 megahertz vs 2800 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.43 inch vs 6 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (86.2 percents vs 84.6 percents)