Huawei Mate 20 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Compare Phones: Huawei Mate 20 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (462.67 USD vs 529.64 USD)
Better camera (846 points vs 626 points)
Better connectivity (805 points vs 679 points)
Better display (963 points vs 758 points)
Against:
Worse battery (545 points vs 644 points)
Worse performance (791 points vs 813 points)
Worse design (785 points vs 892 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (39.92 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 32.33 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (720 megahertz vs 572 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2700 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (10 cores vs 18 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (538 pixels per inch vs 377 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.39 inch vs 6.7 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (88.14 percents vs 90.23 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (644 points vs 545 points)
Better performance (813 points vs 791 points)
Better design (892 points vs 785 points)
Against:
Higher price (529.64 USD vs 462.67 USD)
Worse camera (626 points vs 846 points)
Worse connectivity (679 points vs 805 points)
Worse display (758 points vs 963 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better front camera resolution (32.33 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 39.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2700 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
More gpu cores (18 cores vs 10 cores)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (572 megahertz vs 720 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.7 inch vs 6.39 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (377 pixels per inch vs 538 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (90.23 percents vs 88.14 percents)