Nokia 6.1 vs UMiDIGI Bison
Compare Phones: Nokia 6.1 vs UMiDIGI Bison
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (114.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Better design (337 points vs 201 points)
Against:
Worse camera (194 points vs 815 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 773 points)
Worse performance (370 points vs 670 points)
Worse connectivity (395 points vs 849 points)
Worse display (356 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (74.17 percents vs 75.28 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (815 points vs 194 points)
Better battery (773 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (670 points vs 370 points)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 395 points)
Better display (630 points vs 356 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 114.99 USD)
Worse design (201 points vs 337 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (75.28 percents vs 74.17 percents)