Huawei Honor 20 Lite vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Compare Phones: Huawei Honor 20 Lite vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (172.99 USD vs 215 USD)
Better camera (687 points vs 681 points)
Better design (683 points vs 667 points)
Against:
Worse battery (254 points vs 857 points)
Worse performance (486 points vs 551 points)
Worse connectivity (176 points vs 263 points)
Worse display (613 points vs 775 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3400mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 750 megahertz)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (415 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.21 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.31 percents vs 84.78 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (857 points vs 254 points)
Better performance (551 points vs 486 points)
Better connectivity (263 points vs 176 points)
Better display (775 points vs 613 points)
Against:
Higher price (215 USD vs 172.99 USD)
Worse camera (681 points vs 687 points)
Worse design (667 points vs 683 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5020mAh vs 3400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (750 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.21 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 415 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.78 percents vs 83.31 percents)