Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite vs Ulefone Armor X7 Pro

For:

      Better camera (941 points vs 93 points)

      Better battery (494 points vs 377 points)

      Better performance (687 points vs 283 points)

      Better display (855 points vs 46 points)

      Better design (735 points vs 60 points)

Against:

      Higher price (251 USD vs 169.99 USD)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4030mAh vs 4000mAh)

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.39 inch vs 5 inch)

      Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 294 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (86.08 percents vs 58.42 percents)

For:

      Lower price (169.99 USD vs 251 USD)

Against:

      Worse camera (93 points vs 941 points)

      Worse battery (377 points vs 494 points)

      Worse performance (283 points vs 687 points)

      Worse display (46 points vs 855 points)

      Worse design (60 points vs 735 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4030mAh)

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.39 inch)

      Lower pixel density (294 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (58.42 percents vs 86.08 percents)