UMiDIGI F2 vs Huawei Enjoy 10e
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F2 vs Huawei Enjoy 10e
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (914 points vs 148 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 773 points)
Better performance (710 points vs 326 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 176 points)
Better display (521 points vs 232 points)
Better design (598 points vs 420 points)
Against:
Higher price (254.99 USD vs 182.46 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 278 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 81.59 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (182.46 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (148 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (773 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (326 points vs 710 points)
Worse connectivity (176 points vs 956 points)
Worse display (232 points vs 521 points)
Worse design (420 points vs 598 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (278 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (81.59 percents vs 83.12 percents)