UMiDIGI F2 vs Oppo A52
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F2 vs Oppo A52
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254.99 USD vs 339.35 USD)
Better camera (914 points vs 215 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 773 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 290 points)
Against:
Worse performance (710 points vs 867 points)
Worse display (521 points vs 548 points)
Worse design (598 points vs 749 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 82.75 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (867 points vs 710 points)
Better display (548 points vs 521 points)
Better design (749 points vs 598 points)
Against:
Higher price (339.35 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Worse camera (215 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (773 points vs 869 points)
Worse connectivity (290 points vs 956 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.75 percents vs 83.12 percents)