Huawei Mate 30 Pro vs Cubot Note 20 Pro
Compare Phones: Huawei Mate 30 Pro vs Cubot Note 20 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (819 points vs 233 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 366 points)
Better performance (920 points vs 870 points)
Better connectivity (753 points vs 130 points)
Better display (673 points vs 246 points)
Better design (900 points vs 579 points)
Against:
Higher price (740.7 USD vs 139.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (39.92 Megapixels vs 12.39 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More gpu cores (16 cores vs 3 cores)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 270 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (94.36 percents vs 85.3 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (139.99 USD vs 740.7 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (233 points vs 819 points)
Worse battery (366 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (870 points vs 920 points)
Worse connectivity (130 points vs 753 points)
Worse display (246 points vs 673 points)
Worse design (579 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.6)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (12.39 Megapixels vs 39.92 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 16 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (270 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.3 percents vs 94.36 percents)