Samsung Galaxy A51 vs POCO F3

For:

      Lower price (262.59 USD vs 389.99 USD)

      Better camera (923 points vs 725 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (308 points vs 706 points)

      Worse performance (502 points vs 841 points)

      Worse connectivity (152 points vs 638 points)

      Worse display (795 points vs 937 points)

      Worse design (878 points vs 917 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (32.33 Megapixels vs 20 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4520mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

Against:

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.67 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (87.72 percents vs 86.16 percents)

For:

      Better battery (706 points vs 308 points)

      Better performance (841 points vs 502 points)

      Better connectivity (638 points vs 152 points)

      Better display (937 points vs 795 points)

      Better design (917 points vs 878 points)

Against:

      Higher price (389.99 USD vs 262.59 USD)

      Worse camera (725 points vs 923 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (20 Megapixels vs 32.33 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4000mAh)

For:

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.5 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (86.16 percents vs 87.72 percents)