Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Doogee S86 Pro

For:

      Lower price (224.79 USD vs 250.49 USD)

      Better camera (703 points vs 321 points)

      Better display (775 points vs 296 points)

      Better design (667 points vs 88 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (743 points vs 966 points)

      Worse performance (727 points vs 871 points)

      Worse connectivity (263 points vs 884 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5020mAh vs 8500mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (750 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.09 inch)

      Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 282 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (84.78 percents vs 68.34 percents)

For:

      Better battery (966 points vs 743 points)

      Better performance (871 points vs 727 points)

      Better connectivity (884 points vs 263 points)

Against:

      Higher price (250.49 USD vs 224.79 USD)

      Worse camera (321 points vs 703 points)

      Worse display (296 points vs 775 points)

      Worse design (88 points vs 667 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (8500mAh vs 5020mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 750 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.09 inch vs 6.67 inch)

      Lower pixel density (282 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (68.34 percents vs 84.78 percents)