Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Doogee S86 Pro
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Doogee S86 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (224.79 USD vs 250.49 USD)
Better camera (700 points vs 318 points)
Better display (773 points vs 295 points)
Better design (664 points vs 88 points)
Against:
Worse battery (742 points vs 967 points)
Worse performance (725 points vs 870 points)
Worse connectivity (259 points vs 883 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5020mAh vs 8500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (750 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.09 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 282 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.78 percents vs 68.34 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (967 points vs 742 points)
Better performance (870 points vs 725 points)
Better connectivity (883 points vs 259 points)
Against:
Higher price (250.49 USD vs 224.79 USD)
Worse camera (318 points vs 700 points)
Worse display (295 points vs 773 points)
Worse design (88 points vs 664 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (8500mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 750 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.09 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (282 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (68.34 percents vs 84.78 percents)