Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro vs Oppo Reno4
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro vs Oppo Reno4
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (443.6 USD vs 563.99 USD)
Better camera (980 points vs 944 points)
Better battery (758 points vs 488 points)
Better display (937 points vs 882 points)
Against:
Worse performance (832 points vs 895 points)
Worse connectivity (395 points vs 755 points)
Worse design (729 points vs 881 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse front camera resolution (19.7 Megapixels vs 32.33 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4700mAh vs 4020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.4 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 411 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (87.52 percents vs 84.16 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (895 points vs 832 points)
Better connectivity (755 points vs 395 points)
Better design (881 points vs 729 points)
Against:
Higher price (563.99 USD vs 443.6 USD)
Worse camera (944 points vs 980 points)
Worse battery (488 points vs 758 points)
Worse display (882 points vs 937 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better front camera resolution (32.33 Megapixels vs 19.7 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4020mAh vs 4700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (411 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.4 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.16 percents vs 87.52 percents)