Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z1
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z1
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (369.19 USD vs 459.36 USD)
Better camera (667 points vs 106 points)
Better battery (538 points vs 330 points)
Better performance (742 points vs 71 points)
Better connectivity (637 points vs 1 points)
Better display (896 points vs 350 points)
Better design (883 points vs 297 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (14.48 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4160mAh vs 3700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 6 inch)
Higher pixel density (392 pixels per inch vs 367 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (87.25 percents vs 73.14 percents)
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (459.36 USD vs 369.19 USD)
Worse camera (106 points vs 667 points)
Worse battery (330 points vs 538 points)
Worse performance (71 points vs 742 points)
Worse connectivity (1 points vs 637 points)
Worse display (350 points vs 896 points)
Worse design (297 points vs 883 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 14.48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3700mAh vs 4160mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Lower pixel density (367 pixels per inch vs 392 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (73.14 percents vs 87.25 percents)