Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Oppo Reno5 Z 5G
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Oppo Reno5 Z 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (317 USD vs 392.23 USD)
Better camera (978 points vs 702 points)
Better battery (890 points vs 608 points)
Better performance (700 points vs 448 points)
Against:
Worse connectivity (476 points vs 542 points)
Worse display (877 points vs 888 points)
Worse design (562 points vs 908 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4310mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.47 inch vs 6.43 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 85.22 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better connectivity (542 points vs 476 points)
Better display (888 points vs 877 points)
Better design (908 points vs 562 points)
Against:
Higher price (392.23 USD vs 317 USD)
Worse camera (702 points vs 978 points)
Worse battery (608 points vs 890 points)
Worse performance (448 points vs 700 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4310mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.43 inch vs 6.47 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.22 percents vs 88.05 percents)