Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Oukitel WP9

For:

      Better camera (372 points vs 207 points)

      Better performance (754 points vs 667 points)

      Better display (996 points vs 216 points)

      Better design (967 points vs 72 points)

Against:

      Higher price (339.99 USD vs 215.99 USD)

      Worse battery (748 points vs 968 points)

      Worse connectivity (831 points vs 848 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4600mAh vs 8000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 5.86 inch)

      Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 287 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 71.68 percents)

For:

      Lower price (215.99 USD vs 339.99 USD)

      Better battery (968 points vs 748 points)

      Better connectivity (848 points vs 831 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (207 points vs 372 points)

      Worse performance (667 points vs 754 points)

      Worse display (216 points vs 996 points)

      Worse design (72 points vs 967 points)

For:

      Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (8000mAh vs 4600mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (5.86 inch vs 6.81 inch)

      Lower pixel density (287 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (71.68 percents vs 91.65 percents)