Cubot X50 vs POCO M3 Pro 5G
Compare Phones: Cubot X50 vs POCO M3 Pro 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (966 points vs 763 points)
Better performance (871 points vs 263 points)
Better connectivity (745 points vs 679 points)
Better design (595 points vs 539 points)
Against:
Higher price (281.19 USD vs 239.43 USD)
Worse battery (519 points vs 713 points)
Worse display (605 points vs 713 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 955 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 83.94 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (239.43 USD vs 281.19 USD)
Better battery (713 points vs 519 points)
Better display (713 points vs 605 points)
Against:
Worse camera (763 points vs 966 points)
Worse performance (263 points vs 871 points)
Worse connectivity (679 points vs 745 points)
Worse design (539 points vs 595 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (955 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Against:
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.94 percents vs 84.02 percents)