Cubot Cheetah 2 vs Cubot Note Plus
Compare Phones: Cubot Cheetah 2 vs Cubot Note Plus
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (84.67 USD vs 115.99 USD)
Better battery (133 points vs 55 points)
Better connectivity (58 points vs 54 points)
Better display (353 points vs 275 points)
Better design (278 points vs 263 points)
Against:
Worse camera (404 points vs 463 points)
Worse performance (139 points vs 194 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/2 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 13.13 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 13.38 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (3000mAh vs 2800mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.5 inch vs 5.2 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (72.62 percents vs 69.41 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (463 points vs 404 points)
Better performance (194 points vs 139 points)
Against:
Higher price (115.99 USD vs 84.67 USD)
Worse battery (55 points vs 133 points)
Worse connectivity (54 points vs 58 points)
Worse display (275 points vs 353 points)
Worse design (263 points vs 278 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (13.13 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.38 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2)
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2800mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 5.5 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.41 percents vs 72.62 percents)