Vernee Thor Plus vs Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Compare Phones: Vernee Thor Plus vs Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (175.99 USD vs 251 USD)
Better battery (950 points vs 494 points)
Against:
Worse camera (195 points vs 941 points)
Worse performance (141 points vs 687 points)
Worse connectivity (46 points vs 476 points)
Worse display (175 points vs 855 points)
Worse design (277 points vs 735 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6200mAh vs 4030mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 500 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.39 inch)
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.29 percents vs 86.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (941 points vs 195 points)
Better performance (687 points vs 141 points)
Better connectivity (476 points vs 46 points)
Better display (855 points vs 175 points)
Better design (735 points vs 277 points)
Against:
Higher price (251 USD vs 175.99 USD)
Worse battery (494 points vs 950 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4030mAh vs 6200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (500 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.39 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (86.08 percents vs 71.29 percents)