Vernee Thor Plus vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: Vernee Thor Plus vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (175.99 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Better battery (950 points vs 869 points)
Against:
Worse camera (195 points vs 914 points)
Worse performance (141 points vs 710 points)
Worse connectivity (46 points vs 956 points)
Worse display (175 points vs 521 points)
Worse design (277 points vs 598 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6200mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.29 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (914 points vs 195 points)
Better performance (710 points vs 141 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 46 points)
Better display (521 points vs 175 points)
Better design (598 points vs 277 points)
Against:
Higher price (254.99 USD vs 175.99 USD)
Worse battery (869 points vs 950 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5150mAh vs 6200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 71.29 percents)